← All talks
Available to book

The AI-Native Organization

How to find the people already doing consequential work with AI, then give them room to change the company.

Format
Keynote or leadership briefing
Length
30 minutes plus guided Q&A
Best for
CEOs, talent leaders, functional executives, and companies building internal AI capability
An editorial talent map showing many AI work traces and one operator path examined through a scoring lens
Program studySam Gaddis

The decision

Who inside the company is already AI-native?

A resume can say someone is fluent with AI. Their work habits tell you much more. This session gives leaders an observable definition of AI-native work, a way to find hidden operator-engineers, and a careful approach to evaluating real practice with consent and context.

Built for the group. The benchmark changes with the company. A portfolio operator, a finance leader, and a product builder should not be graded against the same model of good work.

Signature segment

An AI-native operator, reconstructed from the work.

I walk through a prepared set of anonymized work artifacts, from the original request to the system that replaced several handoffs. The evidence shows how strong operators use agents in consequential work.

How it runs

The session, end to end.

  1. 01 / Tailor

    Choose the role

    I select the work patterns that matter for the roles and operating context in the group.

  2. 02 / Show

    Follow the evidence

    A prepared case traces the work from prompt to process change and makes the observable behaviors clear.

  3. 03 / Send

    Take the scorecard home

    Leaders receive a private scorecard and a small, consent-based way to test it.

What people take home

Three usable decisions.

  1. Define AI-native work through observable behavior instead of tool familiarity or self-reported fluency.
  2. Find the people already compressing handoffs, building small systems, and teaching the organization what works.
  3. Design a useful internal benchmark with consent, privacy, and human judgment built into the process.

Bring it to your group

Start with the room and the decision in front of it.

Tell me who will be there, what they are wrestling with, and what a useful session would change.

Talk through the session